One course versus a route per person

Generic AI training treats the organisation as one audience. Your risk does not work that way.

The honest case for a generic course: it is cheap, fast to roll out, and everyone sees the same thing. The honest case against it starts the moment two people with the same job title sit at different distances from an AI decision, because from that moment one of them is undertrained and the other is bored.

What a generic course does well

Fast rollout with one procurement decision and one link for everyone.
A shared vocabulary: everyone has heard the same terms once.
A defensible first step when nothing at all was arranged before.

What changes when the route adapts

The intake asks about your organisation before anyone gets content: sector, the AI systems actually in use, and who works with them in which role.
Depth follows risk instead of job title. A recruiter screening candidates with a ranking tool gets more than a colleague who only drafts texts, even when their titles match.
Examples come from your own sector rather than a generic office, across 15 sectors.
Every assignment is recorded with the answers and rule versions that produced it, so months later you can show why that route was right for that person.
When the law changes materially, the affected content is named and reviewed, and the log of that is public.

None of this needs to be taken on faith: the intake is public, so the fastest way to judge the difference is to run it for your own organisation.

Try the intake

When generic is still the right call

A very small team with uniform, low-risk AI use, or a first awareness wave before a proper rollout. A generic course is a fine start; the mistake is filing it as the finish.

Why this maps onto Article 4

Since 27 July 2026, Article 4 asks providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy, taking into account context, and explicitly not to guarantee a fixed individual level. Context is the operative word: the measure has to fit the people and the AI use it covers. A route built from your systems and roles is that fit made visible, and the record it leaves behind is how you show it.

See what changed in the law

See the difference on your own organisation

The 5-minute scan maps your AI use to the roles around it and shows where a generic course would leave gaps.

AI Act evidence routes

Pick the route that matches your AI Act evidence question.

Focused pages per question: from mandatory Article 4 literacy and training records to sector evidence and an audit-ready dossier.

Generic AI training treats the organisation as one audience. Your risk does not work that way.

What a generic course does well

What changes when the route adapts

When generic is still the right call

Why this maps onto Article 4

See the difference on your own organisation

Pick the route that matches your AI Act evidence question.

AI course vs. Article 4 program

AI Act evidence dossier

Free AI course vs Article 4 evidence

Classroom vs e-learning

Generic AI training treats the organisation as one audience. Your risk does not work that way.

What a generic course does well

What changes when the route adapts

When generic is still the right call

Why this maps onto Article 4

See the difference on your own organisation

Pick the route that matches your AI Act evidence question.

AI course vs. Article 4 program

AI Act evidence dossier

Free AI course vs Article 4 evidence

Classroom vs e-learning