Necessary storage is on. Analytics load only after consent. Learn more
A free AI course can form part of an appropriate Article 4 approach, but organisation size does not decide that. More relevant factors are knowledge, experience, role, context of use, people affected, and the AI systems involved. LearnWize adds role-based learning paths, assessment, and organisational evidence records when a generic course does not fit. Article 4 prescribes no specific dossier or certificate format.
Evidence chain
LearnWize Article 4
Free courses do what they promise: transfer knowledge. Article 4 simply asks for something else, namely measures that fit role, context and the AI systems in use, and the ability to demonstrate that. This is what generic free training usually lacks:
No link between role, risk and training content.
No record of who completed which training and when.
No testing that shows understanding actually landed, only viewing behaviour.
Generic content goes stale while the law keeps moving, as with the Digital Omnibus.
No reporting you can show a client, auditor or supervisory authority.
Training tracks per sector and role for HR, healthcare, financial services, education and government, so the content matches what people actually do with AI in their work.
Understanding is tested, not just attendance logged. Participants earn certificates that can be verified externally, so a certificate actually proves something.
Selected evidence changes and exports form an append-only SHA-256 chain, making later changes visible. That is the difference with a standalone certificate.
Content is based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements.
Your people completed an open online course or a vendor academy. That foundation is valuable. Add role-based testing and records on top, so knowledge is matched by evidence.
You are weighing free training against a programme. Start with the free 5-minute evidence gap scan to see where you stand and which evidence is still missing.
Your clients are asking for AI Act training. The free partner pilot lets you test a co-branded or white-label programme with your own group, without maintaining legal content yourself.
Map roles, AI use, and missing evidence.
Connect teams to use cases, risks, and learning paths.
Launch LearnWize training by audience.
Test understanding with scenarios and certificates.
Deliver reporting, evidence dossier, and refresh advice.
Choose the variant that fits your question: training, course, masterclass, speaker, or evidence.
AI course vs. Article 4 program
A standalone AI course is not Article 4 evidence. See the difference with a role-based program that links training to role, risk, and demonstrable evidence.
Mandatory AI literacy
Understand what the AI Act means for mandatory AI literacy and make training demonstrable with role matrices, scenarios, and evidence reporting.
Certificate vs evidence dossier
Is a certificate enough for Article 4? Compare attendance lists, standalone certificates and role-based evidence dossiers, and see what a reviewer really looks for.
Article 4 of the EU AI Act has applied since 2 February 2025 and requires organisations to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy among people working with AI systems on their behalf. The benchmark is not that everyone completed a course, but that measures fit technical knowledge, experience, education and the context in which the AI systems are used. There is no separate fine attached to Article 4. The Digital Omnibus has been formally adopted but not yet published; the adopted text changes Article 4 into a duty to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. The current text remains in force until the amendment enters into force. Afterwards, clients, auditors, or supervisory authorities can still ask for substantiation of the measures taken.
Free AI courses are a good starting point for individual curiosity and general basics about prompts, capabilities and limitations. A free course can form part of appropriate measures, but suitability depends on knowledge, experience, context, people affected, and actual AI use, not organisation size. The friction sits with roles that already use AI operationally: recruiters screening candidates, healthcare professionals working with decision support, staff in financial services, teachers, and policy makers in government. For those roles Article 4 asks for content that matches their context and risks, and it is exactly that link between role, risk and training that generic free courses lack.
Evidence means an organisation can show who completed which training, how understanding was assessed, and which role it matched. An open course does not provide that context automatically. LearnWize records it in an organisation-wide dossier with learner records. Selected evidence changes and exports receive a traceable audit chain; content is updated periodically under agreed arrangements.
If you opt for a programme, there are three delivery models. Co-brand: the programme runs under your name alongside the platform, useful for training providers and partners. For white-label delivery, brand and delivery scope are agreed in advance; removing every LearnWize reference, including certificate and registry branding, is not a standard promise. SCORM 1.2: you run the modules in your own LMS; LearnWize delivers packages tested end-to-end in Moodle, while other LMSs depend on their own SCORM 1.2 implementation. When to choose what: stay with free courses if your AI use is minimal and you can substantiate that choice, choose SCORM if your LMS and reporting are already in order, and choose co-brand or white-label if you want testing, certificates and an evidence file without building anything yourself.
For the legal status and wording, we refer to primary, official sources. The EU AI Act currently in force remains leading until an amendment is published and enters into force.
The official text of the EU AI Act in force, including Article 4 on AI literacy.
The official procedure file with the current legislative status, documents, and steps towards publication in the Official Journal.
The adopted amending text, including the wording on measures that support the development of AI literacy.
Sometimes. With limited, low-risk AI use, a free basic course can form part of appropriate measures if you substantiate why that level fits knowledge, experience, role, context, and the actual use. Once roles use AI operationally, role-specific measures are needed. Assessment and records are not a prescribed format, but they make the chosen approach demonstrable; generic free courses usually lack that evidence layer.
There is no specific fine attached to Article 4 itself. Supervisory authorities can weigh AI literacy when assessing other obligations, and clients and auditors increasingly ask about it. The better reasons to go beyond a free course are risk reduction, effective human oversight of AI output (Article 14) and the expectation that is growing in tenders and sector agreements.
That depends on your professional body. LearnWize holds no CPD accreditations of its own; whether training counts is decided by the professional body and the status of the training provider offering the programme. If you work through an accredited provider that uses LearnWize co-branded or white-label, that provider may award points under its own rules. Check with your professional body first.
Yes. LearnWize can be delivered through co-branding or an agreed white-label scope. Assessment, certificates, and organisational evidence records remain available; branding and certificate treatment are confirmed in a free partner pilot.
LearnWize delivers SCORM 1.2 packages that are tested end-to-end in Moodle. Other LMSs usually work too, but that depends on their SCORM 1.2 implementation, so test one module in your own environment first. If you want testing, verifiable certificates and the evidence file without configuring your own LMS, the hosted platform with co-branding or white-label is often simpler.
There is no separate fine attached to Article 4. The Digital Omnibus has been formally adopted but is not yet published in the Official Journal; the adopted text changes Article 4 into a duty to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. Until the amendment enters into force, the current Article 4 text remains applicable. Demonstrable literacy also remains relevant afterwards for human oversight, clients, and supervisory authorities. Article 4 has not been removed.
Who delivers AI literacy you can actually prove? LearnWize is the training and evidence platform that delivers role-based learning paths, testing, and an audit-ready dossier. Embed AI runs the AI governance scan and the 30-day Readiness Sprint. Responsible AI Platform is the knowledge source that explains the EU AI Act and Article 4. Together you move from explanation to training to evidence.
LearnWize
Training and evidence platform: learning paths, testing, certificates, and an Article 4 evidence dossier per role.
Embed AI
AI governance scan (2,950 euros, creditable) and the 30-day Readiness Sprint (9,900 euros) as a baseline and starting point.
Responsible AI Platform
Knowledge source that explains what the EU AI Act and Article 4 require and how they relate to Annex III.