AI Act module for training providers
AI Act module for training providers: ready-made AI literacy for your catalogue
An AI Act module for training providers does not have to be built in-house. LearnWize supplies a role-based AI literacy layer through co-branding, an agreed white-label model, or SCORM 1.2. This adds training, assessment, and organisational evidence records to your existing offer. Article 4 has applied since 2 February 2025; implementation must fit the audience, context, and actual AI use.
Co-brand or white-label
SCORM 1.2 for your LMS
Evidence per participant
Free partner pilot
Partner proposition
LearnWize Article 4
1
Your audience2
Role-based content3
Co-brand or white-label4
SCORM 1.25
Assessment6
Certificate7
Reporting8
Evidence dossierArticle 4
An attendance list is not proof of AI literacy
The demand reaches you through members, learners and clients, but the legal AI content sits outside your own field. Building it yourself takes months and the result ages fast: AI Act deadlines and interpretations keep moving, as the Digital Omnibus shows. And even with good content, the biggest gap remains the evidence underneath the training: who did what, was understanding tested, and can you show that per participant?
No legal AI expertise in-house to build and maintain a current module.
Building it yourself takes months, while members and clients are asking now.
Content ages fast: AI Act deadlines and interpretations keep moving.
An attendance list or certificate of participation shows no tested understanding.
No per-participant reporting that survives a client or compliance review.
Evidence
The evidence layer under your catalogue
Role-based learning paths
Participants follow a track that fits their role: an accountant gets different scenarios than an HR adviser or a board member. That matches what Article 4 asks for: literacy tailored to context and use.
Progress and testing per participant
You see per participant which modules were completed and with what test result. Understanding is tested, not just attendance recorded.
Completion and evidence records
The certificate confirms completion; time spent and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. Whether it counts towards a credit scheme depends on the rules of the professional body and the status of the provider.
Review-ready Article 4 file
One report showing who received which training, when, and whether understanding was tested. Usable towards clients, Legal, HR or a supervisory authority.
Teams
Who this works for
Training providers and CPD academies
For academies that train accountants, notaries, mediators, lawyers or other professions and want to add an AI line to their catalogue.
Trade associations and professional bodies
For organisations that want to offer members an up-to-date AI literacy line without building content or a learning environment themselves.
Learning platforms and L&D providers
For platforms that want to extend their catalogue with an AI Act module based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements, delivered as SCORM 1.2 inside their own LMS.
From pilot to scale
1
Demo
Review the content, evidence layer, and delivery models together.
2
Pilot
Test one defined learning path with your own audience at no cost.
3
Deliver
Choose co-brand, white-label academy, or SCORM 1.2 for your LMS.
4
Scale
Add audiences and track completion, assessment, and evidence centrally.
Continue your partner route
Compare audiences, delivery models, and evidence routes for your own training offer.
CPD points and AI training
AI Act training and CPD points: how it works
Does AI training count toward your CPD points? Your professional body decides. Learn how points schemes work and what evidence AI Act training leaves you with.
White-label AI Act e-learning
White-label EU AI Act e-learning under your brand
Offer EU AI Act e-learning under your own brand: your branding, role-based tracks, legal content maintenance and evidence reporting. Start with a free partner pilot.
AI Act content for your catalog
EU AI Act content for learning platforms and LMS
Add role-based Dutch EU AI Act content to your LMS: SCORM 1.2, based on official EU sources, with reporting dependent on your platform implementation.
AI Act for accountancy
AI Act training for accountancy and tax
Accountants and tax advisers already use AI. Make Article 4 AI literacy demonstrable with a role-based track, certificates and organisation-wide evidence records.
AI Act for notarial practice
EU AI Act training for civil-law notaries
AI literacy for civil-law notaries, junior notaries and support staff: role-based training, certificates and a review-ready Article 4 evidence file for your firm.
AI literacy for mediators
EU AI Act module for mediators and CPD providers
What the EU AI Act means for mediators and confidential advisers: AI literacy focused on confidentiality, GDPR and professional rules, with evidence per participant.
AI Act for payroll professionals
AI Act training for payroll professionals
AI is already inside payroll and HR software. Learn what the EU AI Act expects from payroll professionals and how to make AI literacy role-based and provable.
AI Act in real estate
EU AI Act training for real estate professionals
Role-based AI Act training for agents, valuers and back office, with assessment, certificates and organisational evidence records.
Certificate vs evidence dossier
Certificate vs evidence dossier under Article 4
Is a certificate enough for Article 4? Compare attendance lists, standalone certificates and role-based evidence dossiers, and see what a reviewer really looks for.
Classroom vs e-learning
Classroom or e-learning for AI literacy?
Classroom AI training or e-learning for Article 4? Compare reach, evidence and depth, and see why a hybrid model usually works best for AI literacy.
Build or buy an AI Act course
Build or buy an AI Act course?
Should you build your own AI Act course or buy one in? An honest comparison of legal maintenance, the evidence layer and delivery models, plus when building wins.
SCORM vs white-label academy
SCORM package or white-label academy
Choosing between a SCORM package in your own LMS and a white-label academy for AI Act training? Compare admin effort, branding, evidence and when to pick which.
Background
Adding an AI Act line to your catalogue: how it works
Demand for AI literacy training is landing with training providers because the EU AI Act has required organisations to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy among their staff since 2 February 2025 (Article 4). There is no separate fine attached to Article 4. The Digital Omnibus has been formally adopted but not yet published; the adopted text changes Article 4 into a duty to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. The current text remains in force until the amendment enters into force. Meanwhile accountants, notaries, mediators, lawyers and HR professionals already use ChatGPT or Copilot daily, and the transparency obligations of Article 50 apply from 2 August 2026. Professions do not take their training question to a software vendor but to their trusted provider: the one with the network, the academy and often the recognition.
There are three delivery models. Co-branded: the training carries both names; the provider brings the network and possibly the recognition, the content partner brings the legal AI layer. This suits organisations that want to start quickly and visibly borrow subject-matter authority. For white-label delivery, brand and delivery scope are agreed in advance; removing every LearnWize reference, including certificate and registry branding, is not a standard promise. This suits established academies with a strong brand of their own. SCORM 1.2: the module as a package inside the provider's own LMS, for platforms that want everything in one environment. The SCORM version is tested end to end in Moodle; behaviour in other LMSs depends on their SCORM 1.2 implementation.
What separates an AI Act module from a one-off webinar is the evidence layer. Article 4 asks for a sufficient level of AI literacy, matched to context and role. An attendance list only shows presence, not understanding. The certificate confirms completion; time spent and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. On top of that sits a review-ready Article 4 file for the organisation: one report that shows Legal, HR or a client who received which training and whether understanding was tested.
A partner pilot is the usual first step and is free. A small group of real participants completes one track, and the provider assesses content, didactics and the evidence reporting. Fix four agreements up front. Brand: whose name appears on the training and the certificate. Client ownership: the learner remains the provider's client, not the content partner's. Data: who sees participant data and who may export it. And credits: whether the training counts towards a CPD scheme depends on the rules of the professional body and the status of the provider; the provider often brings the recognition, the content partner supplies the content and the evidence underneath. Check this before launch.
Official sources
Check the legal basis
For the legal status and wording, we refer to primary, official sources. The EU AI Act currently in force remains leading until an amendment is published and enters into force.
EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
The official text of the EU AI Act in force, including Article 4 on AI literacy.
European Parliament Legislative Observatory, 2025/0360(COD)
The official procedure file with the current legislative status, documents, and steps towards publication in the Official Journal.
Adopted Digital Omnibus text, PE-CONS 30/26
The adopted amending text, including the wording on measures that support the development of AI literacy.
Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions for training providers and learning platforms
Does this module count towards my CPD credits?
That depends on the rules of your professional body and on the status of the training provider offering it. The certificate confirms completion; time spent and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. In practice the provider partner often brings the recognition, while the content partner supplies the content and the evidence underneath. Confirm this with the professional body before launch.
Can we run this fully under our own brand?
Yes. For white-label delivery, brand and delivery scope are agreed in advance; removing every LearnWize reference, including certificate and registry branding, is not a standard promise. Co-branding is the middle form where both names are visible. Which form fits depends on how strong your own brand is and how quickly you want to start. Brand agreements are fixed before the pilot.
Will this work in our own LMS?
Yes, as a SCORM 1.2 package. The implementation has been tested end to end in Moodle, including completion and score reporting. Behaviour in another LMS depends on its own SCORM 1.2 implementation, so we test one module in your environment before rollout. For a full evidence layer outside the LMS, use co-branding or an agreed white-label academy.
Do we need legal AI expertise in-house?
No, that is exactly what you are licensing. The content is maintained as the law moves, such as the shift of the high-risk obligations to December 2027 and the Article 50 transparency obligations from August 2026. You supply what a content partner does not have: the network, the relationship with learners and knowledge of your field.
What does a partner pilot look like?
A partner pilot is free and small: one track, a limited group of real participants from your audience, and an organisation-wide evidence report with learner records afterwards. You assess the content, the didactics and whether the reporting matches what your clients or members expect. Agreements on brand, client ownership and data are fixed up front, so scaling up needs no new negotiation.
Is AI literacy actually mandatory for our learners?
Article 4 of the EU AI Act has applied since 2 February 2025 to organisations that use AI; there is no separate fine attached to it. The Digital Omnibus has been formally adopted but not yet published; the adopted text changes Article 4 into a duty to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. The current text remains in force until the amendment enters into force. Human oversight under Article 14 assumes people who understand AI, and clients and professional bodies increasingly expect demonstrable AI literacy regardless.
Delivery models
One content layer, three ways to deliver
LearnWize provides role-based AI Act content with assessment and evidence. Training providers and learning platforms can start small through co-brand, launch their own academy, or place the modules in an existing LMS through SCORM 1.2.