Necessary storage is on. Analytics load only after consent. Learn more
LearnWize gives training providers one role based EU AI Act module through co-branding, an agreed white-label scope or SCORM 1.2, with assessment and evidence records for the organisation. The commercial starting point is a EUR 2,950 Partner Proof, fully credited against implementation at launch. It fits providers with concrete demand, realistic annual volume, a decision owner and a target launch date.
Partner proposition
LearnWize Article 4
The demand reaches you through members, learners and clients, but the legal AI content sits outside your own field. Building it yourself takes months and the result ages fast: AI Act deadlines and interpretations keep moving, as the Digital Omnibus shows. And even with good content, the biggest gap remains the evidence underneath the training: who did what, was understanding tested, and can you show that per participant?
No legal AI expertise in-house to build and maintain a current module.
Building it yourself takes months, while members and clients are asking now.
Content ages fast: AI Act deadlines and interpretations keep moving.
An attendance list or certificate of participation shows no tested understanding.
No per-participant reporting prepared for client or compliance review.
Participants follow a track that fits their role: an accountant gets different scenarios than an HR adviser or a board member. That matches what Article 4 asks for: literacy tailored to context and use.
You see per participant which modules were completed and with what test result. Understanding is tested, not just attendance recorded.
The certificate confirms completion; time spent and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. Whether it counts towards a credit scheme depends on the rules of the professional body and the status of the provider.
One report showing who received which training, when, and whether understanding was tested. Usable towards clients, Legal, HR or a supervisory authority.
For academies that train accountants, notaries, mediators, lawyers or other professions and want to add an AI line to their catalogue.
For organisations that want to offer members an up-to-date AI literacy line without building content or a learning environment themselves.
For platforms that want to extend their catalogue with an AI Act module based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements, delivered as SCORM 1.2 inside their own LMS.
Review the content, evidence layer, and delivery models together.
Validate one defined learning path in the EUR 2,950 Partner Proof, fully credited at launch.
Choose co-brand, white-label academy, or SCORM 1.2 for your LMS.
Add audiences and track completion, assessment, and evidence centrally.
Compare audiences, delivery models, and evidence routes for your own training offer.
Best AI Act training platforms
What makes an EU AI Act training platform audit-ready? LearnWize compared with an LMS, a generic course, and a GRC tool, with honest good for and less good for framing.
AI literacy evidence
Make AI literacy demonstrable with role matrices, scenario exercises, certificates, dashboards, and an Article 4 evidence dossier.
SCORM vs white-label academy
Choosing between a SCORM package in your own LMS and a white-label academy for AI Act training? Compare admin effort, branding, evidence and when to pick which.
Build or buy an AI Act course
Should you build your own AI Act course or buy one in? An honest comparison of legal maintenance, the evidence layer and delivery models, plus when building wins.
CPD points and AI training
Does AI training count toward your CPD points? Your professional body decides. Learn how points schemes work and what evidence AI Act training leaves you with.
White-label AI Act e-learning
Offer EU AI Act e-learning under your own brand: your branding, role-based tracks, legal content maintenance and evidence reporting. Start with a paid Partner Proof.
AI Act content for your catalog
Add role-based Dutch EU AI Act content to your LMS: SCORM 1.2, based on official EU sources, with reporting dependent on your platform implementation.
AI Act for accountancy
Accountants and tax advisers already use AI. Make Article 4 AI literacy demonstrable with a role-based track, certificates and organisation-wide evidence records.
AI Act for notarial practice
AI literacy for civil-law notaries, junior notaries and support staff: role-based training, certificates and a review-ready Article 4 evidence file for your firm.
AI literacy for mediators
What the EU AI Act means for mediators and confidential advisers: AI literacy focused on confidentiality, GDPR and professional rules, with evidence per participant.
AI Act for payroll professionals
AI is already inside payroll and HR software. Learn what the EU AI Act expects from payroll professionals and how to make AI literacy role-based and provable.
AI Act in real estate
Role-based AI Act training for agents, valuers and back office, with assessment, certificates and organisational evidence records.
Certificate vs evidence dossier
Is a certificate enough for Article 4? Compare attendance lists, standalone certificates and role-based evidence dossiers, and see what a reviewer really looks for.
Classroom vs e-learning
Classroom AI training or e-learning for Article 4? Compare reach, evidence and depth, and see why a hybrid model usually works best for AI literacy.
Demand for AI literacy training is landing with training providers because Article 4 of the EU AI Act has applied since 2 February 2025. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 was published on 24 July 2026 and entered into force on 27 July 2026. Article 4 now requires providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy, taking account of technical knowledge, experience, education, training, context and the people concerned. It does not guarantee an individual outcome. Meanwhile accountants, notaries, mediators, lawyers and HR professionals already use ChatGPT or Copilot daily, and the transparency obligations of Article 50 apply from 2 August 2026. Professions do not take their training question to a software vendor but to their trusted provider: the one with the network, the academy and often the recognition.
There are three delivery models. Co-branded: the training carries both names; the provider brings the network and possibly the recognition, the content partner brings the legal AI layer. This suits organisations that want to start quickly and visibly borrow subject-matter authority. For white-label delivery, brand and delivery scope are agreed in advance; removing every LearnWize reference, including certificate and registry branding, is not a standard promise. This suits established academies with a strong brand of their own. SCORM 1.2: the module as a package inside the provider's own LMS, for platforms that want everything in one environment. The SCORM version is tested end to end in Moodle; behaviour in other LMSs depends on their SCORM 1.2 implementation.
What separates an AI Act module from a one-off webinar is the evidence layer. Article 4 does not prescribe a fixed training format, assessment or record. An attendance list only shows presence, not understanding. The certificate confirms completion; time spent and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. For demonstrable implementation, a review-ready Article 4 file is practically stronger: one report showing Legal, HR or a client who received which measure and what results were recorded.
A Partner Proof is the usual first step and costs EUR 2,950, fully creditable against implementation at launch. A small group of real participants completes one track, and the provider assesses content, didactics and the evidence reporting. Fix four agreements up front. Brand: whose name appears on the training and the certificate. Client ownership: the learner remains the provider's client, not the content partner's. Data: who sees participant data and who may export it. And credits: whether the training counts towards a CPD scheme depends on the rules of the professional body and the status of the provider; the provider often brings the recognition, the content partner supplies the content and the evidence underneath. Check this before launch.
For legal status and wording, we refer to primary official sources. Check both the applicable base text and Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, plus any later amendments.
The official original base text of the EU AI Act. For the current Article 4 wording and timelines, read it together with Regulation (EU) 2026/1744.
The official procedure file for the completed Digital Omnibus on AI legislative procedure.
The official amending regulation in force, including the new Article 4 wording and revised AI Act timelines.
That depends on the rules of your professional body and on the status of the training provider offering it. The certificate confirms completion; time spent and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. In practice the provider partner often brings the recognition, while the content partner supplies the content and the evidence underneath. Confirm this with the professional body before launch.
Yes. For white-label delivery, brand and delivery scope are agreed in advance; removing every LearnWize reference, including certificate and registry branding, is not a standard promise. Co-branding is the middle form where both names are visible. Which form fits depends on how strong your own brand is and how quickly you want to start. Brand agreements are fixed before the pilot.
Yes, as a SCORM 1.2 package. The implementation has been tested end to end in Moodle, including completion and score reporting. Behaviour in another LMS depends on its own SCORM 1.2 implementation, so we test one module in your environment before rollout. For a full evidence layer outside the LMS, use co-branding or an agreed white-label academy.
No, that is exactly what you are licensing. The content is maintained as the law moves, such as the shift of the high-risk obligations to December 2027 and the Article 50 transparency obligations from August 2026. You supply what a content partner does not have: the network, the relationship with learners and knowledge of your field.
A Partner Proof costs EUR 2,950 and stays small: one module, a limited group of real participants from your audience, and an organisation-wide evidence report with learner records afterwards. You assess the content, the didactics, and whether the reporting fits your clients or members. We credit the full amount against implementation when you launch.
Article 4 of the EU AI Act has applied since 2 February 2025 to organisations that use AI. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 was published on 24 July 2026 and entered into force on 27 July 2026. Article 4 now requires providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy, taking account of technical knowledge, experience, education, training, context and the people concerned. This is a duty to take measures, not a guarantee of an individual outcome. Human oversight under Article 14 also assumes people who understand AI, while clients and professional bodies increasingly expect demonstrable implementation.
LearnWize provides role-based AI Act content with assessment and evidence. Training providers and learning platforms can start small through co-brand, launch their own academy, or place the modules in an existing LMS through SCORM 1.2.