SCORM vs white-label academy
SCORM package or your own academy: which delivery model fits your AI Act training?
If you already have an LMS, SCORM 1.2 often fits best: LearnWize supplies the module packages while your environment manages learners and reporting. Without a suitable LMS, an agreed white-label academy can remove more operational work; co-branding is the middle route. With SCORM, completion and assessment reporting depend on the specific LMS implementation and should be tested in a pilot.
SCORM 1.2, Moodle tested
White-label or co-brand
Verifiable certificates
Exportable evidence file
Partner proposition
LearnWize Article 4
1
Your audience2
Role-based content3
Co-brand or white-label4
SCORM 1.25
Assessment6
Certificate7
Reporting8
Evidence dossierArticle 4
The choice is not about technology, it is about admin and evidence.
Many training providers and organisations pick a delivery model on instinct and get stuck later: the LMS turns out to be limited in reporting, or the standalone academy takes more administration than expected. The real questions are where learners already study, who carries the admin burden and what evidence you will need to show.
No clear view of what your own LMS does and does not record.
Brand experience gets diluted when you serve multiple clients from one environment.
Learner-level evidence records are hard to reconstruct after the fact.
The admin burden of running an extra platform is underestimated.
Evidence
What each delivery model gives you
SCORM 1.2 in your own LMS
Completion and scores flow back into your existing reporting. The integration has been tested end-to-end in Moodle; in other LMSs, behaviour depends on their own SCORM 1.2 implementation. Limitations: less rich interactions, and evidence runs through your LMS reporting.
White-label academy
An agreed brand experience with role-based tracks, assessment, and verifiable certificates. The academy provides an organisation-wide export with learner records; selected evidence changes and exports receive a traceable audit chain.
Co-brand as the middle route
Your brand alongside the platform's, without running a learning environment yourself. You get the same assessments and evidence reporting as white-label, with less setup work.
Content grounded in EU sources
The content is based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements. Scope, responsibilities, and update arrangements are agreed in advance.
Teams
Who this comparison is for
Training providers with their own LMS
You already have reach and administration in a learning environment and want to add AI Act training without introducing a second platform.
Training providers without a platform
You want to offer AI Act training under your own brand with role profiles, certificate verification and evidence reporting, without building or running software yourself.
Organisations rolling out internally
Choose between SCORM 1.2 in the existing LMS and an academy with organisation-wide evidence reporting.
From proof to scale
1
Demo
Review the content, evidence layer, and delivery models together.
2
Proof
Validate one defined learning path in the EUR 2,950 Partner Proof, fully credited at launch.
3
Deliver
Choose co-brand, white-label academy, or SCORM 1.2 for your LMS.
4
Scale
Add audiences and track completion, assessment, and evidence centrally.
Continue your partner route
Compare audiences, delivery models, and evidence routes for your own training offer.
White-label AI Act e-learning
White-label EU AI Act e-learning under your brand
Offer EU AI Act e-learning under your own brand: your branding, role-based tracks, legal content maintenance and evidence reporting. Start with a paid Partner Proof.
AI Act content for your catalog
EU AI Act content for learning platforms and LMS
Add role-based Dutch EU AI Act content to your LMS: SCORM 1.2, based on official EU sources, with reporting dependent on your platform implementation.
AI Act module for training providers
AI Act module for training providers
Want to add an AI Act or AI literacy line to your training catalogue? Three delivery models (co-brand, white-label, SCORM 1.2) with evidence per participant.
LearnWize versus LMS
LearnWize versus an LMS for Article 4
An LMS distributes content, LearnWize proves per role that people are ready. Why audit-ready evidence per role beats a generic LMS for EU AI Act Article 4.
Build or buy an AI Act course
Build or buy an AI Act course?
Should you build your own AI Act course or buy one in? An honest comparison of legal maintenance, the evidence layer and delivery models, plus when building wins.
Background
SCORM package or white-label academy: how to decide
The need for AI literacy training stems from Article 4 of the EU AI Act, which has applied since 2 February 2025. There is no separate fine attached to Article 4. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 was published on 24 July 2026 and has applied since 27 July 2026. Article 4 now requires providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. It does not prescribe a guaranteed individual outcome. In the meantime, regulators and clients expect organisations to show who was trained, what was assessed and when. For training providers and organisations, the delivery model is therefore not a technical detail: it determines where learners study, who runs the administration and how easily you can produce evidence later.
A SCORM package fits when an LMS with reach and administration is already in place. The module runs in the environment where employees or course participants already log in, and completion and scores flow back into existing reporting. LearnWize delivers SCORM 1.2 and has tested that integration end-to-end in Moodle; in other LMSs, behaviour depends on their SCORM 1.2 implementation, so test in your own environment first. There are two limitations: SCORM 1.2 offers less rich interactions than a dedicated academy, and the evidence file runs through your LMS reporting rather than a direct export.
A white-label academy fits when there is no LMS, or when a training provider wants a branded experience of its own. Learners get role-based tracks per sector and role, assessments with verifiable certificates and a traceable audit chain for selected evidence changes and exports. The academy provides an organisation-wide export containing evidence records per learner; a separate learner export is not promised. Co-brand sits in between: your brand alongside the platform's, with the same functionality but less setup work. The content is based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements; scope, responsibilities, and update arrangements are agreed in advance.
The decision comes down to five factors. If an LMS with active users is already in place, SCORM usually wins on administration and adoption. If brand experience matters most, for example because you sell training under your own name, white-label wins. If you want minimal extra admin, SCORM inside an existing LMS is lighter than a second platform. If your evidence needs are heavy, the academy offers the most direct route to an exportable file. And if you serve many clients at once, a white-label or co-brand environment scales more easily than separate SCORM deliveries per client.
Official sources
Check the legal basis
For legal status and wording, we refer to primary official sources. Check both the applicable base text and Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, plus any later amendments.
EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
The official original base text of the EU AI Act. For the current Article 4 wording and timelines, read it together with Regulation (EU) 2026/1744.
European Parliament Legislative Observatory, 2025/0359(COD)
The official procedure file for the completed Digital Omnibus on AI legislative procedure.
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Digital Omnibus on AI
The official amending regulation in force, including the new Article 4 wording and revised AI Act timelines.
Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions for training providers and learning platforms
Will the SCORM package work in our LMS?
The package is SCORM 1.2 and has been tested end-to-end in Moodle: completion and scores demonstrably flow back there. Most LMSs support SCORM 1.2, but exact behaviour depends on their implementation. Always test one module in your own environment before a broad rollout, so you know registration and reporting work as expected.
Can we offer the training under our own brand?
Yes. For white-label delivery, brand and delivery scope are agreed in advance; removing every LearnWize reference, including certificate and registry branding, is not a standard promise. Both variants include role-based tracks, assessments with verifiable certificates and an exportable evidence file. Training providers use a paid Partner Proof to test the branded experience with a group of their own first.
When is SCORM the better choice over an academy?
With an active LMS and good reporting, SCORM is often the lighter route. The academy fits when you need an agreed brand experience, richer interactions, and organisation-wide evidence reporting. Test both assumptions in the Partner Proof.
How does the Article 4 evidence file work with a SCORM delivery?
With SCORM, evidence runs through your own LMS reporting: completion and scores are recorded there and exported with that system's reporting tools. The academy provides an organisation-wide export containing evidence records per learner; a separate learner export is not promised. Both routes can work; the academy route takes less manual effort during a review.
Does this training count towards my CPD points?
LearnWize holds no CPD accreditations of its own. Whether training counts depends on the rules of your professional body and on the status of the training provider offering it. If you are a provider with your own accreditation, you can often use the modules within your existing recognition; always check with your professional body first.
Can we switch delivery models later?
Yes, but setup is still required. Content is based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements. Moving from SCORM to the academy gives learners accounts in the new environment; historical completion data remains available in the LMS reporting export. Any import or migration is tested and agreed separately.
Delivery models
One content layer, three ways to deliver
LearnWize provides role-based AI Act content with assessment and evidence. Training providers and learning platforms can start small through co-brand, launch their own academy, or place the modules in an existing LMS through SCORM 1.2.