Necessary storage is on. Analytics load only after consent. Learn more
A learning platform can add Dutch-language AI Act content without building its own legal editorial team. LearnWize supplies role-based modules through co-branding or SCORM 1.2, technically tested in Moodle. Completion and assessment results can flow back depending on the LMS implementation. The provider remains responsible for integration, catalogue positioning, and any formal CPD recognition.
Partner proposition
LearnWize Article 4
Many platforms answer the demand for AI training with a general course about prompts and tools. For Article 4 of the EU AI Act that is not enough: the law asks for AI literacy that fits the role, the context and the systems people actually use. A course without role differentiation, assessment and reporting gives your clients no file they can show internally or to a supervisory authority to demonstrate what has been arranged.
No link between role, risk and learning content: everyone gets the same generic course.
Outdated content: AI Act deadlines and expectations shift, but the course does not move with them.
No assessment of understanding, so no evidence that participants actually master the material.
No reporting that clients can show to Legal, HR or management.
Separate learning paths for employees who use AI, teams that work with customer data and managers who provide oversight. Practical scenarios instead of abstract legal text, so the training feels recognizable for every role.
The package has been tested end-to-end in Moodle and reports completion and scores back to the LMS. Behavior in other LMSs depends on their SCORM 1.2 implementation; a short technical test settles that quickly.
The AI Act keeps moving: deadlines shift and expectations become more concrete. Content is based on official EU sources; update scope, responsibilities, and timing are agreed before the pilot.
The certificate confirms completion; progress, time spent, and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. An organisation-wide report combines those records into a review-ready Article 4 file.
Your clients are asking for Dutch-language AI Act content. You add the title as a SCORM 1.2 package and your platform records completion and scores just like any other title in your offering.
Your catalogue is missing AI literacy content based on official EU sources in Dutch. Add it through co-branding or an agreed white-label scope.
You serve organizations that already use AI widely and now need evidence. Role-based training plus reporting makes your platform the place where that evidence is created.
Review the content, evidence layer, and delivery models together.
Test one defined learning path with your own audience at no cost.
Choose co-brand, white-label academy, or SCORM 1.2 for your LMS.
Add audiences and track completion, assessment, and evidence centrally.
Compare audiences, delivery models, and evidence routes for your own training offer.
AI Act module for training providers
Want to add an AI Act or AI literacy line to your training catalogue? Three delivery models (co-brand, white-label, SCORM 1.2) with evidence per participant.
White-label AI Act e-learning
Offer EU AI Act e-learning under your own brand: your branding, role-based tracks, legal content maintenance and evidence reporting. Start with a free partner pilot.
LearnWize versus LMS
An LMS distributes content, LearnWize proves per role that people are ready. Why audit-ready evidence per role beats a generic LMS for EU AI Act Article 4.
AI literacy online training
AI literacy online training for teams, with live sessions, practical cases, testing, certificates, and Article 4 evidence.
Article 4 AI Act training
Article 4 AI Act training with role-based learning paths, scenario exercises, certificates, and evidence dossiers for organizations using AI.
Since 2 February 2025, Article 4 of the EU AI Act applies: organizations that provide or use AI systems ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy among their staff. That demand lands directly on learning platforms, because organizations look for training inside the learning environment they already have. On top of that, the transparency obligations of Article 50 apply from 2 August 2026, and the adopted Digital Omnibus text moves most standalone high-risk obligations under Annex III to 2 December 2027 once the amendment enters into force. A platform with an up-to-date Dutch-language AI Act title answers that demand straight from its catalog; a platform without one sends clients to another channel.
AI use stopped being an IT-only affair long ago. Recruiters screen candidates with AI support, marketers generate content, finance professionals work with AI analyses, and managers oversee AI-assisted decisions, where Article 14 requires effective human oversight. Evidence of AI literacy therefore means more than an attendance list: it links role and learning content to assessed understanding, a completion certificate, and organisational records containing progress, time, and results per participant. A generic AI course without those elements produces knowledge, but not a file an organization can fall back on.
Technically there are three delivery models. As a SCORM 1.2 package, the title runs in the LMS of the platform or the end client; the package has been tested end-to-end in Moodle and reports completion and scores back through the standard SCORM connection. Behavior in other LMSs depends on their SCORM 1.2 implementation, so a technical test is part of every onboarding. As a co-brand, the title sits in the catalog under two brands; as a white-label, within an agreed brand and delivery scope. Content is based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements.
A partnership starts small. You select one client with a concrete AI literacy need, for example an organization that has rolled out Copilot or ChatGPT widely. That client runs the title as a pilot: first the technical SCORM test in the platform, then the role-based modules for a defined group of participants. At the end there are completion figures, assessment results and an evidence report on the table. That is how you decide whether the title goes catalog-wide, and the pilot client walks away with the first building block of an Article 4 file.
For the legal status and wording, we refer to primary, official sources. The EU AI Act currently in force remains leading until an amendment is published and enters into force.
The official text of the EU AI Act in force, including Article 4 on AI literacy.
The official procedure file with the current legislative status, documents, and steps towards publication in the Official Journal.
The adopted amending text, including the wording on measures that support the development of AI literacy.
The title ships as a SCORM 1.2 package and has been tested end-to-end in Moodle, including completion and scores reported back to the LMS. Whether it behaves identically in your environment depends on how your LMS implements SCORM 1.2. That is why a partnership starts with a technical test in your platform, so registration and reporting are demonstrably correct before clients ever see the title.
Yes. There are three formats: co-brand (your brand alongside LearnWize), white-label (fully in your house style) and a neutral SCORM package that blends into your existing catalog. The content and the legal maintenance are identical in every variant; only the presentation and brand experience differ.
The content is based on official EU sources and updated under agreed arrangements. Article 50 applies from 2 August 2026; the adopted Digital Omnibus text moves most standalone Annex III obligations to 2 December 2027 once the amendment enters into force. Update scope and responsibilities are agreed in advance.
Article 4 asks for AI literacy that fits the role, the context and the systems people use. A general course about prompts does not cover how a recruiter, finance professional or manager handles specific risks, and usually does not test understanding. Without role mapping, assessment and records, an organization cannot show the measure was appropriate. That distinction is the difference between training and evidence.
LearnWize holds no CPD accreditations of its own. The certificate confirms completion; time spent and assessment results belong to the organisational evidence records. Platforms working with recognized providers bring that recognition themselves; LearnWize then supplies the content and the evidence underneath. So never claim guaranteed points to your users.
Together you pick one client that already works with AI and needs demonstrable AI literacy. That client runs the title in your platform: first the technical SCORM test, then participants complete the role-based modules, and you review completion, scores and the evidence report together. Based on that, you decide on wider placement in the catalog. A free partner pilot is available for platforms.
LearnWize provides role-based AI Act content with assessment and evidence. Training providers and learning platforms can start small through co-brand, launch their own academy, or place the modules in an existing LMS through SCORM 1.2.