Necessary storage is on. Analytics load only after consent. Learn more
ISO 42001 requires competence through clause 7.2 and awareness through clause 7.3, and your auditor wants to see evidence for both. LearnWize provides role-based AI literacy, a completion log, and a per-cohort dossier designed for auditor review, alongside substantiation for your Article 4 measures. Embed AI builds the AIMS implementation and governance, and Praxikon explains the legal context. That is how you connect your AI management system to demonstrable evidence about your people.
Evidence chain
LearnWize Article 4
ISO 42001 describes an AI management system, but clause 7.2 and 7.3 put the burden of proof on people: who is competent for their role and who is aware of the AI policy. Many organisations have solid system and process documentation, yet cannot show per person that competence was built and tested. That is where an auditor digs in, because without that evidence the management system looks stronger on paper than in practice.
A policy document shows intent, not demonstrable competence per role.
An attendance list does not cover 7.3 awareness, because awareness has to be tested.
Without a completion log you miss the trail that clause 7.2 requires as evidence.
Standalone certificates miss the link to role, AI use, and risk context.
Document which teams use AI, which tasks are involved, and which knowledge each role needs.
Connect training to the context in which AI is used, including impact on candidates, citizens, customers, or employees.
Let employees practice with realistic work situations, not only generic AI explanations.
Keep participation, scores, certificates, and completion records as evidence that understanding was tested.
Give HR, Legal, Compliance, IT, and leadership a clear view of where the organization stands.
Decide when training needs to be updated because of new tools, policies, roles, or risks.
For teams setting up or certifying an AIMS who want competence and awareness evidence in order.
For those who must demonstrate clause 7.2 and 7.3 to an auditor, alongside the Article 4 evidence from the AI Act.
For oversight of where the organisation stands, with priorities and decisions on refresh and scaling.
Map roles, AI use, and missing evidence.
Connect teams to use cases, risks, and learning paths.
Launch LearnWize training by audience.
Test understanding with scenarios and certificates.
Deliver reporting, evidence dossier, and refresh advice.
Choose the variant that fits your question: training, course, masterclass, speaker, or evidence.
Best Article 4 training
The best AI literacy training under Article 4 is role-based and audit-ready. LearnWize delivers learning paths plus an evidence dossier, Embed AI runs the scan and Readiness Sprint.
Article 4 AI literacy training
Article 4 AI literacy training for organizations that want role-based employee training and demonstrable evidence.
AI literacy evidence
Make AI literacy demonstrable with role matrices, scenario exercises, certificates, dashboards, and an Article 4 evidence dossier.
ISO 42001 is the international standard for an AI management system, and two clauses touch your people directly. Clause 7.2 requires you to determine the competence needed for everyone who affects the AI management system, to ensure they have it, and to keep evidence of it. Clause 7.3 requires those same people to be aware of the AI policy, their own contribution, and the consequences of deviating. Many organisations have strong system documentation but cannot show this people evidence per person. That is where an AIMS audit often stalls.
LearnWize fills that evidence layer. You map which roles affect the management system, assign the right learning path per role, test understanding, and log each completion in a completion log and per-cohort dossier. Governance tooling documents system measures, while LearnWize documents learning measures and results. This aligns with evidence around clauses 7.2 and 7.3 and can also support substantiation of Article 4 measures.
If you want to put the AIMS implementation and governance in order, Embed AI builds that with a scan and the Readiness Sprint. If you want to understand the legal context, Praxikon explains how the AI Act, Article 4, and Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 relate. The three brands work together: Embed AI for the AIMS implementation and governance, LearnWize for the competence and awareness evidence layer, Praxikon for the legal explanation.
Start the 5-minute scan and see immediately which roles need which level of AI literacy, and which competence and awareness evidence for ISO 42001 you are still missing today.
Clause 7.2 is about competence: you determine the competence needed for people who affect the AI management system, you make sure they have it, and you keep evidence of it. Clause 7.3 is about awareness: people must understand the AI policy, their contribution, and the consequences of deviating. Both require not only training but demonstrable evidence per person. LearnWize records that evidence in a completion log and a per-cohort dossier.
They are two tracks that can share part of the same people evidence. Under Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 4 requires providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. ISO 42001 requires competence and awareness in parallel. A role-based learning path and shared dossier can support both tracks, but do not replace assessment by an auditor or legal adviser.
The dossier is built around what an auditor wants to see: per role which competence was needed, which learning path was followed, which test was passed, when it happened, and when a refresh is due. That maps to the burden of proof in clause 7.2 and the awareness requirement of 7.3. LearnWize delivers the evidence layer, while the formal certification decision of course stays with the auditor and the certification body.
An AIMS document describes the system, the processes, and the roles, but clause 7.2 and 7.3 require evidence that the people in those roles are actually competent and aware. That people evidence does not live in a policy document. LearnWize fills exactly that gap: it builds the completion log and the per-cohort dossier while people learn, so your documentation and your evidence line up.
Enterprise pricing is 149 euros per participant per year, 119 euros from 100 participants and 95 euros from 250 participants, with an annual minimum of 9,900 euros. The final scope follows after the scan. If you first want the AIMS implementation and governance in order, Embed AI builds that with the scan of 2,950 euros (creditable) and the Readiness Sprint of 9,900 euros. Start with the 5-minute scan to see which competence and awareness evidence you are missing today.
No. LearnWize helps organizations organize AI literacy in a practical and demonstrable way. Formal legal advice or a compliance opinion should be assessed separately.
A certificate is useful, but often misses the link to role, AI use, risk context, scenario practice, and management reporting. That chain makes the evidence stronger.
Start with the AI Literacy Readiness Scan. It maps roles, AI use, priorities, and missing evidence pieces.
Who delivers AI literacy you can actually prove? LearnWize is the training and evidence platform that delivers role-based learning paths, testing, and an audit-ready dossier. Embed AI runs the AI governance scan and the 30-day Readiness Sprint. Praxikon is the knowledge source that explains the EU AI Act and Article 4. Together you move from explanation to training to evidence.
LearnWize
Training and evidence platform: learning paths, testing, certificates, and an Article 4 evidence dossier per role.
Embed AI
AI governance scan (2,950 euros, creditable) and the 30-day Readiness Sprint (9,900 euros) as a baseline and starting point.
Praxikon
Knowledge source that explains what the EU AI Act and Article 4 require and how they relate to Annex III.