Head-to-head
LearnWize vs DataCamp for EU AI Act training
Both are real options, for different questions. This page puts LearnWize and DataCamp side by side on verifiable characteristics, each cell with the public source it was read from. The honest summary comes first, the table second.
Pick DataCamp when
Your priority is building real technical AI capability in data and engineering teams, and AI Act evidence is a separate track handled by compliance.
Pick LearnWize when
Your question is not only training but demonstrability: which people, in which roles, can show they are ready, and does that record hold up when someone critical reads it.
Side by side
| Characteristic | LearnWize | DataCamp |
|---|---|---|
| Built around the EU AI ActThe catalogue is structured around AI Act obligations, not general AI skills with a compliance chapter. | Yes | Noskills platform, no Article 4 programme on the AI literacy pagesource (2026-08-24) |
| Content re-reviewed when the law changesA published process that says which training content a material legal change sent back for review, with dates.see the proof | Yespublic evidence log, per legal change | Not published |
| Route adapts to the person, not only the roleTwo people with the same job title get different depth when their systems and their distance to an AI decision differ.see the proof | Yes | Not published |
| Every assignment can be replayedThe platform records which answers and which rule version produced a route, so months later you can show why that route was right for that person. | Yes | Not published |
| Role-based routesDifferent roles get different content, matched to how close they sit to an AI decision. | Yes | Yespathways per role and levelsource (2026-08-24) |
| Sector-specific scenariosExamples come from the learner's own sector rather than from a generic office. | Yes15 sectors | Nosource (2026-08-24) |
| Organisation-level evidence fileBeyond per-person certificates: one exportable file that shows measures per role, for the organisation. | Yes | Partlycertifications, assessments and a skill matrixsource (2026-08-24) |
| AI system register includedThe platform records which AI systems are in use and connects them to the people around them. | Yes | Nosource (2026-08-24) |
| Runs in your own LMSSCORM or LTI delivery into an existing LMS, so people learn where they already learn. | YesSCORM, LTI 1.3, xAPI | Not publishednot stated on the AI literacy pagesource (2026-08-24) |
| Dutch and EnglishFull content in both languages. | Yes | NoEnglish-first contentsource (2026-08-24) |
| Public pricingPrices are published rather than quote-only. | Partlystarting prices published, scope set after the scan | Partlyindividual plans public, business via salessource (2026-08-24) |
| Free way to startA meaningful free entry point exists. | Yesfree 5-minute scan | Yesfree tier for individualssource (2026-08-24) |
Facts checked on 2026-08-24 from each provider's public pages. "Not published" means their public pages do not state it.
The question that decides it
Strip away the feature lists and one question remains: when someone asks your organisation to show which measures you took for which roles, where does that answer live? If it lives in your compliance team's spreadsheet, DataCamp plus that spreadsheet can be a fine answer. If you want the answer to be a file the platform maintains for you, connected to the AI systems you actually use, that is the problem LearnWize was built around.
Fair questions
- Is DataCamp enough for Article 4?
- Article 4 asks providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy, matched to context. No single course, from any provider including us, is automatically enough: what counts is whether the measures fit your people and your AI use, and whether you can show what you did. Any provider on this page can be part of that answer.
- Who wrote this comparison?
- LearnWize did, and that bias is exactly why every factual cell links to the other provider's own public page with the date we checked it. If we got something wrong, mail us and we correct the cell and its date.
Not sure which fits? Measure it.
The 5-minute scan maps your AI use to the roles around it. The result tells you which kind of platform fits, even if it is not ours.